Feedback in 21st century higher education

dc.contributor.advisorGiraldo Arcila, Fabio Nelson
dc.contributor.authorRopero Casiano, Dayaris Jheliksa
dc.contributor.authorSánchez Díaz, Luisa María
dc.contributor.orcidFabio Nelson Giraldo Arcila [0000-0002-1017-4851]spa
dc.coverage.cityTuluáspa
dc.coverage.spatialTuluá, Valle del Cauca, Colombiaspa
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T22:49:06Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T22:49:06Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.descriptionilustraciones, gráficos, tablasspa
dc.description.abstractThroughout time, educational theorists have been concerned about providing students with different tools to improve their learning process, which is why what we call feedback arises from there, which was born given the need to allow students to identify their shortcomings in academic performance in order to solve them constantly through it, using it as an effective tool to improve the quality of learning, making the necessary adjustments and, in turn, motivate them to continue acquiring new knowledge. From this perspective, feedback is defined as the information provided by a teacher or instructor to a student about his or her work or performance, with the aim of improving his or her results and learning (Klimova & Pikhart, 2022). This paper aims to present feedback practices used in European higher education to help students and teachers to implement this process and improve classroom teaching (Egelandsdai & Krumsvik, 2019). Undoubtedly, this tool is transcendental in the educational field since teachers are concerned that their students have an excellent academic performance and that, in turn, they have a meaningful learning in front of the subject studied. In addition, feedback helps to understand the effectiveness of implementing it in the classroom, identifying better educational practices, improving learning and maximizing the potential of students. The European continent is taken as a reference since it has the evidence demonstrates a constant improvement in educational quality at all levels of education, in addition it has policies that focus on feedback as a means to support and improve the implementation of this educational tool. Likewise, it was determined that feedback seeks to change the meaning of a correction method to learning based on critical thinking. Universities in Europe not only have processes that generate results in students, but also allow teachers to innovate through technological tools and other strategies that enable clear, concise and effective learning.spa
dc.description.degreelevelPregradospa
dc.description.degreenameLicenciado (a) en Lenguas Extranjeras con énfasis en Inglésspa
dc.formatPDFspa
dc.format.extent36 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameInstname:Unidad Central del Valle del Caucaspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Unidad Central del Valle del Caucaspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repositorio.uceva.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12993/4314
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencias de la Educaciónspa
dc.publisher.programLicenciatura en Lenguas Extranjeras con énfasis en Inglésspa
dc.relation.referencesArriagada, C., Venegas, N., & Calzadilla, ó. (2021). The evaluation of professional co-teaching practices. Praxis y Saber, 2-18.spa
dc.relation.referencesCostelloe, L., & Egan, A. (2020). "Because, as a teacher, giving feedback and assessment is actually really difficult": using self- and peer-assessment to develop Higher Education teachers' skills in assessment and feedback. 6th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (pp. 501-505). Valencia: Universitat Politècnica de València.spa
dc.relation.referencesFlodén, J. (2017). The impact of student feedback on teaching in Higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1054-1068.spa
dc.relation.referencesGonzález Rodríguez, L. M., & Álvarez Mosquero, P. (2020). The impact of feedback and explicit rhetorical instruction on EFL students' writing proficiency in higher education. Atlantis, Journal of the Spanish Association of Anglo-American Studies 42(1), 120-142.spa
dc.relation.referencesHuisman, B., Saab, N., Van den Broek, P., & Driel, J. v. (2019). The impact of formative peer feedback on higher education students' academic writing: a Meta- Analyisis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44 (6), 863-880.spa
dc.relation.referencesKlimova, B., & Pikhart, M. (2022). Application of corrective feedback using emerging technologies among L2 university students. Cogent education, 1-14.spa
dc.relation.referencesLutovac, S., Kaasil, R., Komulainen, J., & Maikkola, M. (2017). University lecturers' emotional responses to and coping with student feedback: a Finnish case study. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 235-250.spa
dc.relation.referencesRasi, P., & Vuojari, H. (2018). Toward personal and emotional connectivity in mobile higher education through asynchronous formative audio feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology 49(2), 292-304.spa
dc.relation.referencesRochera, M., Enge, A., & Coll, C. (2021). The effects of teacher' feedback: a case study of an online discussion forum in Higher Education. Journal of Distance Education 21(67), 1- 24.spa
dc.relation.referencesSánchez-Martí, A., Moreno, J. L. M., & Ion, G. (2019). Design and Validation of a Learning Perception Questionnaire through Peer Feedback in Higher Education. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación-e Avaliação Psicológica, 4(53), 113-128.spa
dc.relation.referencesVan Klaveren, C., Kooiman, K., Cornelisz, I., & Meeter, M. (2018). The Higher Education Enrollment Decision:Feedback on Expected Study Success and Updating Behavior. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness 12(1), 67-89.spa
dc.relation.referencesZhao, Y., & Ellis, R. (2020). The relative effects of implicit and explicit corrective feedback on the acquisition of 3rd person -s by Chinese university students: A classroom-based study. LANGUAGE TEACHING RESEARCH, 361-363.spa
dc.rightsDerechos reservados - Unidad Central del Valle del Caucaspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessspa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cbspa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)*
dc.rights.localCerradospa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0*
dc.subject.proposalFeedbackspa
dc.subject.proposalCenturyspa
dc.subject.proposalHigherspa
dc.subject.proposalEducationspa
dc.titleFeedback in 21st century higher educationspa
dc.typebachelor thesisspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1fspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisspa
dc.type.localTesis/Trabajo de grado - Monografía - Pregradospa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dcterms.audiencePúblico generalspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentPregradospa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentEspecializaciónspa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Degree Work - Dayaris Ropero and Luisa Sanchez (1).docx.pdf
Tamaño:
941.31 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Trabajo de grado pregrado

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
2.17 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: