Engineering students' perception regarding the implementation of the Institutional Integrated Curriculum Articulation System (SAICI)

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.advisorGiraldo Arcila, Fabio Nelson
dc.contributor.authorBerrio Rincón, Santiago
dc.contributor.authorVanegas Ramírez, Christian
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1017-4851spa
dc.coverage.cityTuluáspa
dc.coverage.spatialTuluá, Valle del Cauca, Colombiaspa
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-05T16:49:29Z
dc.date.available2025-02-05T16:49:29Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.descriptionilustraciones, gráficos, tablasspa
dc.description.abstractEste proyecto de investigación tiene como objetivo analizar las percepciones de los estudiantes de la Facultad de Ingeniería de la Unidad Central del Valle del Cauca (UCEVA) con respecto a la implementación del Sistema de Articulación Institucional del Currículo Integrado (SAICI), centrándose en entender cómo los estudiantes ven el papel del SAICI en el fomento de la colaboración interdisciplinaria, competencias profesionales, y la integración curricular a través de diversos programas de ingeniería, en el contexto de los programas de ingeniería de la UCEVA, que aborda la necesidad de un modelo pedagógico que integre la teoría y la práctica, preparando a los estudiantes para los retos del mundo real. La metodología adoptada es cualitativa, utilizando un enfoque de estudio de caso para recoger y analizar las percepciones de los estudiantes a través de cuestionarios estructurados, con los resultados centrados en la identificación de las percepciones clave, destacando las opiniones mixtas sobre la utilidad del sistema, el conocimiento y su impacto en la colaboración interdisciplinaria. Los resultados indican que, si bien SAICI es reconocido por promover el trabajo en equipo y las habilidades prácticas, los estudiantes expresan su preocupación por su flexibilidad y la alineación de los proyectos con los desafíos de la vida real, destacando también la falta de apoyo adecuado de los profesores, el uso poco claro de instrumentos como las rúbricas de evaluación, y la necesidad de una mejor infraestructura. Las recomendaciones incluyen mejorar la comunicación, proporcionar más orientación al profesorado, garantizar que los proyectos se adapten a disciplinas específicas y mejorar los recursos para el desarrollo de proyectos.spa
dc.description.abstractenglishThis research project aims to analyze the perceptions of students from the Engineering Faculty at the Unidad Central del Valle del Cauca (UCEVA) regarding the implementation of the Sistema de Articulación Institucional del Currículo Integrado (SAICI), focusing on understanding how students view SAICI’s role in fostering interdisciplinary collaboration, professional competencies, and curricular integration across various engineering programs, within the context of UCEVA’s engineering programs, which addresses the need for a pedagogical model that integrates theory and practice, preparing students for real-world challenges. The methodology adopted is qualitative, using a case study approach to collect and analyze student perceptions through structured questionnaires, with the results focusing on identifying key perceptions, highlighting mixed views on the system’s usefulness, knowledge, and its impact on interdisciplinary collaboration. Findings indicate that while SAICI is recognized for promoting teamwork and practical skills, students express concerns about its flexibility and the alignment of projects with real-life challenges, also highlighting the lack of adequate teacher support, the unclear use of instruments like evaluation rubrics, and the need for better infrastructure. Recommendations include enhancing communication, providing more teacher guidance, ensuring projects are tailored to specific disciplines, and improving resources for project development.eng
dc.description.degreelevelPregradospa
dc.description.degreenameLicenciado (a) en Lenguas Extranjeras con énfasis en Inglésspa
dc.description.tableofcontentsIntroduction / Chapter I: Problem Statement / Research Question / General Objective / Specific Objectives / Rationale / Chapter II: Referential Framework / Backgrounds / International Background / National Background / Local Background / Theoretical Framework / Curriculum / Integrated Curriculum & Interstructuring Models / SAICI (System of Institutional Articulation of the Integrated Curriculum) / Formative Assessment / Feedback Model / Cross-curricular Competencies / Cross-curricular Competencies at the UCEVA / Perception / Students’ Perception / Chapter III: Methodology / Research Approach / Planning / Methodological Development / Communication of Results / Evaluation System / Methodological Design / Scope / Population and Sample / Techniques and Instruments / Questionnaires / Closed-Ended Questionnaire / Open-Ended Questionnaire / Field Journal / Excel / Contrast Matrix Grid / Methodology for Determining Units of Analysis, Categories, and Codes / Open Coding / Axial Coding / Selective Coding / Chapter IV: Data Analysis and Discussion / Engineering Faculty Questionnaire Results / Achievement of Objectives / Discussion / Conclusions / Recommendations / Teacher Recommendations / Administrative Recommendations / Student Recommendations / Referenceseng
dc.formatPDFspa
dc.format.extent196 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameInstname:Unidad Central del Valle del Caucaspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Unidad Central del Valle del Caucaspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repositorio.uceva.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12993/4829
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencias de la Educaciónspa
dc.publisher.programLicenciatura en Lenguas Extranjeras con énfasis en Inglésspa
dc.relation.referencesAlonso-Tapia, J., Huertas, J. A., & Ruiz, M. A. (2010). On the nature of motivational orientations: Implications of assessed goals and gender differences for motivational goal theory. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 13(1), 231- 242. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/172/17213039018.pdfeng
dc.relation.referencesAlonso-Tapia, J., Huertas, J. A., & Ruiz, M. A. (2010). Perception of university professors' teaching effectiveness: Validation of a new instrument. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 13(1), 231-242.eng
dc.relation.referencesAshby, I., & Exter, M. (2018). Designing for interdisciplinarity in higher education: Considerations for instructional designers. TechTrends. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0352-zeng
dc.relation.referencesAshby, I., & Exter, M. (2018). Interdisciplinarity as an alternative in higher education. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 7(1), 18- 32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0352-zeng
dc.relation.referencesAssociation of American Colleges and Universities. (2002). Greater expectations: A new vision for learning as a nation goes to college. Washington, DC: Author. https://catalog.library.vanderbilt.edu/permalink/01VAN_INST/13em2a7/alm a991016257589703276eng
dc.relation.referencesAusubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., & Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational psychology: A cognitive view.eng
dc.relation.referencesBeane, J. A. (2011). Curriculum integration and the disciplines of knowledge 1. In The Routledge international handbook of creative learning (pp. 193-199). Routledge. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1036 &context=slceslgeneng
dc.relation.referencesBlack, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7- 74. https://www.gla.ac.uk/t4/learningandteaching/files/PGCTHE/BlackandWiliam19 98.pdfeng
dc.relation.referencesBlack, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the Black Box. School of Education, King's College London. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/44836144eng
dc.relation.referencesBloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Longmans, Green. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316445601600310eng
dc.relation.referencesBloom, B. S., Hastings, J. T., & Madaus, G. F. (1971). Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning. McGrawHill. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000220096.locale=eseng
dc.relation.referencesBolívar, A. (1999). El currículum como un ámbito de estudio. En J. M. Escudero Muñoz (Ed.), Diseño, desarrollo e Innovación del currículum (pp. 27-34). Madrid: Síntesis. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336903219spa
dc.relation.referencesCaine, R. N., & Caine, G. (1997). Education on the edge of possibility. ASCD. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED408654eng
dc.relation.referencesCarlson, A., & Sullivan, L. (2004). Problem-based learning and the development of metacognition. Journal of Excellence in College Teaching, 15(1), 29-54.eng
dc.relation.referencesCare, E., & Luo, R. (2016). Assessment of transversal competences. Policy and practice in the Asia-Pacific region. UNESCO Bangkok. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000246590.locale=eseng
dc.relation.referencesCaviedes, G. (2015). La integración de contenidos en el currículo. In La Innovación Educativa con TIC en Educación Primaria (pp. 85-104). Octaedro.eng
dc.relation.referencesCaviedes, O. (2015). The integrated curriculum from an environmental education perspective. Journal of Educational Research, 23(2), 56- 72. https://investigiumire.unicesmag.edu.co/index.php/ire/article/view/62/72eng
dc.relation.referencesCharmaz, K. (2006), “Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through Qualitative Analysis”. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers/v86n0.825eng
dc.relation.referencesCoicaud, S. (2003). La organización del currículum escolar, algunos criterios de análisis. Educación, lenguaje y Sociedad, 1(1), 49- 66. http://www.biblioteca.unlpam.edu.ar/pubpdf/ieles/n01a04coicaud.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesCousin, G. (2006). An introduction to threshold concepts. Planet (Portsmouth), 17, 4-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.11120/plan.2006.00170004eng
dc.relation.referencesCreswell, J. W. (2009). Research designs: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. https://www.ucg.ac.me/skladiste/blog_609332/objava_105202/fajlovi/C reswell.pdfeng
dc.relation.referencesCreswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications. https://revistapsicologia.org/public/formato/cuali2.pdfeng
dc.relation.referencesCrooks, T. J. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58(4), 438- 481. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543058004438eng
dc.relation.referencesDewey, J. (1938/1993). Experience and education. Simon and Schuster. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131728609335764eng
dc.relation.referencesDíaz, A. (2003). Currículum, tensiones conceptuales y prácticas. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 5(2), 1- 13. https://redie.uabc.mx/redie/article/download/83/147spa
dc.relation.referencesDrake, S. M., & Burns, R. C. (2004). Meeting standards through integrated curriculum. ASCD. https://repository.bbg.ac.id/bitstream/606/1/Meeting_Standards _Through_Integrated_Curriculum.pdfeng
dc.relation.referencesGiraldo Arcila, F. N., Rivera Sanchez, C. P., & Ramos Acosta, L. (2020). El Sistema de Articulación del Currículo Integrado (SACI) en la UCEVA: Una mirada cualitativa desde la perspectiva de los estudiantes.spa
dc.relation.referencesGiraldo Arcila, F. N., & Rios Quintero, K. (2021). Análisis de la percepción de los docentes estudiantes sobre el sistema de articulación del currículo integrado (SACI) implementado por el programa de Lic. en lenguas extranjeras con énfasis en inglés de la Uceva. Revista Boletín Redipe. https://doi.org/10.36260/rbr.v10i1.1176spa
dc.relation.referencesGiraldo, F et al. (2020). “Diseño e implementación de un sistema de articulación Institucional del currículo integrado (SAICI) que facilite la retroalimentación y la evaluación formativa coherente con el PEI de la Uceva.spa
dc.relation.referencesGiraldo, F., & Ramírez, E. (2019). Sistema de Articulación del Currículo Integrado.spa
dc.relation.referencesFusch, G. E. (2001, December). What happens when the ROI model does not fit? Performance Improvement Quarterly, 14, 60–76. doi:10.1111/j.1937-8327.2001.tb00230.xeng
dc.relation.referencesHargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the knowledge society: Education in the age of insecurity. Teachers College Press.eng
dc.relation.referencesHewitt, R., & Barrer, M. (2012). Revisiting threshold concepts and transformational learning: New insights and developments. New York: Routledge.eng
dc.relation.referencesHuber, M. T., & Hutchings, P. (2004). Integrative learning: Mapping the terrain. The academy in transition. Association of American Colleges and Universities.eng
dc.relation.referencesLatorre, A. (1996) "El Diario como Instrumento de Reflexión del Profesor Novel". Actas del III Congreso de E. F. de Facultades de Educación y XIV de Escuelas Universitarias de Magisterio. Guadalajara: Ed. Ferloprint.eng
dc.relation.referencesLikert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 1-55.eng
dc.relation.referencesMcKenna, J., McMartin, F., Terada, Y., Sirivedhin, T., & Agogino, A. (2001). A framework for interpreting students' perceptions of an integrated curriculum. Journal of Engineering Education, 90(3), 363-370.eng
dc.relation.referencesMeyer, D., & Avery, L. (2009) Excel as a qualitative data analysis tool. Field Methods, 21(1), 91-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X08323985eng
dc.relation.referencesMickelson, G. L. (1957). Development of the concept of the unified curriculum. The Journal of Experimental Education, 25(3), 193-198.eng
dc.relation.referencesMiles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.eng
dc.relation.referencesMuñoz-Justicia, J., & Sahagún-Padilla, M. (2017). Hacer análisis cualitativo con Atlas.ti 7 (Versión 1.1). Editorial Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacionaleng
dc.relation.referencesNiño Manrique, J., Arboleda Mazo, A., & Anaya Hernández, L. (2020). Strengthening the integral formation of systems engineers through an integrating project. Journal of Educational Sciences, 18(1), 67-84.70eng
dc.relation.referencesNicolescu, B. (2010). Methodology of transdisciplinarity: Levels of reality, logic of the included middle, and complexity. World Scientific.eng
dc.relation.referencesNiemelä, R. (2022). Subject matter specific curriculum integration. Journal of Education for Teaching.eng
dc.relation.referencesOECD. (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030: The future we want. OECD Publishing.eng
dc.relation.referencesOviedo Gilberto, L. (2004) La definición del concepto de percepción en psicología con base en la teoría Gestalt. Revista de Estudios Sociales, 89-96spa
dc.relation.referencesPiaget, J. (1973). To understand is to invent: The future of education. Viking Press.eng
dc.relation.referencesRamirez Carvajal, D. (2021). The integrated curriculum: An alternative for the configuration of the teacher as a political subject. Journal of Education and Human Development, 10(2), 23-35.eng
dc.relation.referencesRamírez Dávila, M., & Giraldo Arcila, F. N. (2019). Exploration of the Integrated Curriculum Articulation System (SACI) at UCEVA. Unpublished manuscript.eng
dc.relation.referencesRuiz-Primo, M. A., & Furtak, E. M. (2004). Exploring Teachers' Informal Formative Assessment Practices and Students' Understanding in the Context of Scientific Inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(1), 57-93.eng
dc.relation.referencesRuiz-Primo, M. A., & Furtak, E. M. (2004). Informal formative assessment as a tool for teacher learning: Integrating theory and practice. Educational Assessment, 9(3-4), 239-261.eng
dc.relation.referencesSadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119-144.eng
dc.relation.referencesScriven, M. (1967). The Methodology of Evaluation. In R. Tyler, R. Gagne, & M.eng
dc.relation.referencesScriven (Eds.), Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation (pp. 39-83). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.eng
dc.relation.referencesScriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. AERA.eng
dc.relation.referencesShepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4-14.eng
dc.relation.referencesSkinner, B. F. (1961). The science of learning and the art of teaching. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.24.2.vj3828532jhs51x7eng
dc.relation.referencesStiggins, R. J. (2001). Student-Centered Classroom Assessment. Prentice Hall.eng
dc.relation.referencesStiggins, R. J. (2001-2002). Student-centered classroom assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 8(1), 1-19.eng
dc.relation.referencesStiggins, R. J. (2002). Assessment Crisis: The Absence of Assessment FOR Learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(10), 758-765.eng
dc.relation.referencesStrauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511557842eng
dc.relation.referencesStrauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory [PDF document]. Retrieved from https://research-proposal.ir/wpcontent/uploads/2019/06/Basics_of_Qualitative_Research__Tech niques_and_Procedures_for_Developing_Grounded_Theory.pdfeng
dc.relation.referencesUCEVA (2020). Institutional Educational Project (PEI) 2020.eng
dc.relation.referencesVilla, A., & Poblete, M. (2007). Continuous learning and competencies in higher education. Innovar, 17(30), 151-160.eng
dc.relation.referencesVan Dijk, S. (2006). El currículo en el entorno actual. EDUCATIO Revista Regional de Investigación Educativa. Retrieved from http://www.educatio.ugto.mx/PDFs/educatio3/curriculoenentornoactual.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesVargas, L. (2014). Sobre el concepto de percepción. Alteridades, (8), 47–53. https://alteridades.izt.uam.mx/index.php/alte/article/view/588spa
dc.relation.referencesVygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.eng
dc.relation.referencesWiener, N. (1950). The human use of human beings: Cybernetics and society. Houghton Mifflin.eng
dc.relation.referencesWiliam, D., Lee, C., Harrison, C., & Black, P. (2004). Teachers developing assessment for learning: Impact on student achievement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11(1), 49-65.eng
dc.relation.referencesLikert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 1-55.eng
dc.relation.referencesFusch, G. E. (2001, December). What happens when the ROI model does not fit? Performance Improvement Quarterly, 14, 60–76. doi:10.1111/j.1937-8327.2001.tb00230.xeng
dc.rightsDerechos reservados - Unidad Central del Valle del Caucaspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)*
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0*
dc.subject.keywordsCurriculumeng
dc.subject.keywordsInterdisciplinariteng
dc.subject.keywordsArticulation systemeng
dc.subject.keywordsStudent perceptionseng
dc.subject.keywordsFeedbackeng
dc.subject.proposalCurriculumspa
dc.subject.proposalInterdisciplinariedadspa
dc.subject.proposalSistema de articulaciónspa
dc.subject.proposalPercepción de los estudiantesspa
dc.subject.proposalRetroalimentaciónspa
dc.titleEngineering students' perception regarding the implementation of the Institutional Integrated Curriculum Articulation System (SAICI)eng
dc.title.titleenglishEngineering students' perception regarding the implementation of the Institutional Integrated Curriculum Articulation System (SAICI)eng
dc.typebachelor thesisspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1fspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisspa
dc.type.localTesis/Trabajo de grado - Monografía - Pregradospa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dcterms.audiencePúblico generalspa
dcterms.audienceInvestigadoresspa
dcterms.audienceEstudiantesspa
dcterms.audienceDocentesspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentPregradospa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentEspecializaciónspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentMaestríaspa
dcterms.audience.redcolComunidad Cientrífica Colombianaspa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
TG-sberrio-cvanegas.pdf
Tamaño:
1.08 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Trabajo de grado pregrado
Descargar

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 4 de 4
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
2.17 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar
Miniatura
Nombre:
Autorizacion-sberrio-cvanegas.pdf
Tamaño:
97.25 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Cesión de derechos patrimoniales
Descargar
Miniatura
Nombre:
TGAnexos-sberrio-cvanegas.pdf
Tamaño:
2.83 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Anexos trabajo de grado pregrado
Descargar
Miniatura
Nombre:
Certificado-sberrio-cvanegas..pdf
Tamaño:
125.21 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Certificado trabajo de grado recibido
Descargar

Colecciones

Licenciatura en Lenguas Extranjeras con énfasis en Inglés